Support

Forum

A place for Dynadot and community experts alike to ask questions, share ideas, and more.
Dynadot doesn't respect privacy at all - and agent scams are invited
Privacy needed against 1: udrp, 2: agents. In both cases Dynadot has almost zero respect for user privacy. In Udrp cases they surrender our info without our consent. Also if we list a domain at Dynadot, URLs look like this: www. dynadot .com/forsale/domain.tld?drefid=123456789 WHY DISPLAY drefid ????????? It means surrendering our ID to big players. If they learn our contact info via one domain, the rest will be clear. Dynadot, please FIX THIS ASAP, This is totally unacceptable. Also when we search for a domain, when "view" is clicked Dynadot shows our display name, which we prefer doesn't exist at all,... and it identifies us exactly. So we are not protected in critical cases, why forecefully show them. I warned Dynadot many times. Also Dynadot hides buyer info completely, in addition to showin seller info completely, and this prevents reasonable sales, and we don't bother responding to bids, because probably an agent is bidding, and we are forced to sell a 6 figure domain for mid 2 figues. This means, Dynadot is acting like a big agent, just like Afternic, collecting leads, hiding them from us, preventing sales, trying to do arbitrage, or allowing others to do it, and preventing followup. NONE is acceptable.
domainsupply replied domainsupply
ALSO they show PPC ads , and we lose domains in UDRP because of those PPC ads, and we are not even allowed to defend ourselves in UDRP, because the sucker udrp handpicks whose which argument to accept or discard. We need a blank page at worst, not those ugly nasty harmful problematic ppc ads which earn nothing for us (and even if they do I don't want them and hate them completely).. Promote Dynadot and its services, not 3rd party services, if you want to profit from our domains. You can charge for clean pages, and many of them will pay for them and you will earn more than illegal ppc profits.
Reply Quote
0 Replies